Environmentalists on Thursday berated the Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria (SPDC) for poor compliance to regulatory verdict on oil spill matters in its operational fields in the Niger Delta region.
They recalled that the spill regulatory agency, National Oil Spills Detection and Response Agency (NOSDRA), had fined SNEPCO, a Shell subsidiary 3.6 billion dollars for the Bonga, December 2011.
The oil firm however went to court to challenge the fine and lost at the Federal High Court.
A fact-check on the claim indicated that Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of a Federal High Court in Lagos, had on June 20, 2018, upheld the 3.6 billion dollars fine imposed on Shell by NOSDRA, dismissing Shell’s case.
However, Shell declined to pay the fine.
[Also Read] Environmentalist Calls for Adoption of US, Europe Models to Curb Plastic Pollution
The environmentalists under the auspices of Environmental Rights Action/Friends of the Earth Nigeria (oEN), at a forum with spill impacted communities in Ikara, Bayelsa, applauded the NOSDRA for its objectivity.
Mr Alagoà Morris, the Head, Bayelsa Office of oEN, who represented the Acting Executive Director of the group, Mr Chima Williams, spoke on the theme: ‘Resisting Regulatory Capture’.
The NGO frowned on alleged frequent disregard to regulatory directives on oil spill incidents and wondered if the oil firm was self-regulatory, adding that a situation here an operator disagreed frequently with regulators “is unhealthy’’.
“As indicated in the theme, this event is unique as it seems to discourage any attempts at regulatory capture.
“One of the main areas of disagreements between stakeholders in the oil industry is in cause of spill as a lot depends on it.
“While there is nothing wrong in any stakeholder contesting whatever is declared as cause of spill, there are certain things to be considered in arriving at declaring the cause.
[Also Read] Bonga oil spill: NOSDRA directs Shell to pay $3.6bn to affected communities
“In Nigeria, oil industry regulators are supposed to be referees. NOSDRA and state ministries of environment are the regulators.
“As a grassroots organisation, ERA has been working with several communities over the years. Ikarama community is one of those communities. From our records, Ikarama is the community with the highest frequency of documented oil spills.
“The oil spill along Shell’s Adibawa-Okordia delivery line on Nov. 12, 2011, was one of the clear cases of corrosion incidents,” Morris said.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that SPDC had rejected the conclusion of NOSDRA that the Nov 12, 2011, leak on the Adibawa-Okordia pipeline was due to corrosion leading to the subjection to further ultrasonic tests and scans which confirmed the pipe was corroded.
Mr Idris Musa, the Director-General of NOSDRA had told NAN that the agency took the steps to ensure that its conclusions were validated by scientifically accepted best practices.
The people of Ikarama community in Okordia clan of Yenagoa Local Government Area of Bayelsa had threatened to shut down operations of SPDC over alleged failure to pay them compensation and remediate their environment impacted by oil spill.
[Also Read] Bayelsa Community Laments Pollution by Oil Spill from Shell’s Oilfield
Aggrieved members of the host community said that the incident on Okordia-Rumuekpe Trunk Line owned by the SPDC in November 2019 destroyed their cassava farmlands, rubber plantation, fishing lakes and other means of livelihood.
The community members including the paramount ruler, Chief Herbert Alfred Lamie, claimed that Shell abandoned them over 10 months after the incident.
Lamie lamented regular spills in their community and asked the oil firm to remediate the impacted environment and pay victims, community for general and specific damages done to them.
“We want Shell to come and clean up the area and pay the necessary compensation. But if Shell refuses to come and do the needful, we will not allow them to operate on their manifold.” Lamie said.
Also speaking, the Youth President of Ikarama community, Mr Warder Benjamin corroborated the monarch’s position, saying that spills in the community were usually caused by corrosion as some of pipelines had become too old.
He said they had written series of letters to the oil company since the incident took place yet there was no response.
[Also Read] INTELS Contract Termination and Matters Arising
“We have had a series of corrosion spills along the pipeline within the interval of 500 metres. The whole thing points to the fact that the pipes have decayed and are due for replacement.
“How can you use that pipeline since in the 1960s and expect it not to have issues? It has been there transporting oil, yet they will come to accuse the community of vandalising their pipelines.
“That is injustice. That injustice must stop. This particular spill is caused by corrosion and Shell has to be held responsible,” Benjamin said.
When contacted for reaction, Michael Adande, an SPDC spokesman said that he would issue an updated position of the oil firm but had yet to do so at the time of filing the report.